|
- Paper displays a high command of the ideas and concepts
presented in the source materials
-Offers a high level of creative insight on the paper
topic
|
-Paper displays a good command of the ideas and concepts
presented in the source materials
-Minor mis-interpretation of ideas and concepts
-Offers some creative insight on the paper topic.
|
-Paper displays some command of the ideas and concepts
presented in the source materials
-Substantial mis-interpretation of ideas and
concepts
-Lacks creative insight
|
-Paper displays little to no command of the ideas and
concepts presented in the source materials
-Severe misunderstanding of ideas and concepts in source
materials
-Does not offer any creative insight
|
|
-Structure and organization of the paper serves the purpose
of the argument
-There are smooth logical transitions from paragraph to
paragraph
-Conclusion re-presents and summarizes the argument in a
persuasive way
|
-Structure and organization of the paper partially serves
the purpose of the argument
-Only some of the transitions from paragraph to paragraph
are logical
-Conclusion re-presents and summarizes the argument but is
not especially persuasive
|
- Structure and organization partially obstruct the
argument
-Paragraph transitions are misplaced
-Paper lacks a logical flow
-Conclusion is incomplete and does not fully re-present the
argument
|
-Poor structure and organization
-Paper is too long or not long enough
- Lacks paragraph structure and transitions
-Unneccessary repitition
-Incomplete arguments
|
|
-Paper displays a high level of critical analysis
-Makes excellent use of source materials to support
arguments, claims and positions
-Provides creative insight into problems or issues
presented in the assignment
|
-Paper displays a good level of critical analysis
-Makes good use of source materials to support arguments,
claims and positions
-Provides some level of creative insight into problems or
issues presented in the assignment
|
-Paper displays some level of critical analysis
-Some arguments and claims are unsupported and unrelated to
the topic
-Some arguments remain at the level of opinioin and do not
display rigorus reflection on the topic
|
-Paper only repeats back information from the source
materials without any analysis
-Most if not all arguments and claims are
unsupported
- There is no attempt to wrestle or think about the issues
or problems in the text
|